- #Back up software for mac install#
- #Back up software for mac archive#
- #Back up software for mac pro#
It's stupid easy, backups up lightning fast, has native clients for both Mac and Windows so it doesn't gobble up resources like Crashplan Pro. However, it is built on Java, is slow to operate, even slower to backup to Code42's servers, gobbles up memory, and is terrible with extremely large data sets (in my experience).īackblaze - This is my favorite offsite backup solution.
#Back up software for mac pro#
Apple's Time Machine sparsebundles can get easily corrupted and it may be difficult to get it working or pry it open in the event of corruption.ĬrashPlan Pro - This probably is the most feature rich backup solution you can use. This can work, but keep in mind that Time Machine backs up to a sparsebundle when backing up to a NAS. Time Machine to a NAS, then going to the cloud.
#Back up software for mac install#
Download and install Bender, it will backup your critical macOS Server settings so you can easily set it back up if needed - įor those wondering what offsite backup solutions exist for Mac, here are a few options: If you want, you can even get one hard drive, partition it into 2 halves, and have Time Machine backup to one and have Carbon Copy Cloner backup to the other. This will be a fully bootable clone and if the hard drive in your server ever bites the dust, you'll be able to spin up your clone from an external drive in mere minutes. Purchase Carbon Copy Cloner and do a nightly clone of the server to an external hard drive.
#Back up software for mac archive#
Setup Time Machine via USB hard drive, this will keep a historical archive of data as well as current data. Apparently by storing VM images and "system" data locally while replicating critical data offsite i am "abusing" their license terms.įor backing up a Mac server, this is what I would do: They say they're doing this to prevent "misuse" or "abuse" of their platform/software. Overall this change is total bullshit and if they're changing pricing this substantially and suddenly now then what's stopping them from jacking up rates again next year when they decide to bleed partners dry even further. I am working to switch providers but that is definitely a massive pain in the ass with a backup service you have been with for years and have retention history going back that far. This change represents a 250% increase of my current rates. Just a few options i thought of after 30 seconds of thinking about the issue. effectively "grandfathering" in partners current storage usage. There were a bunch of better ways Acronis could have rolled out this change better including, but not limited to:ġ) Grandfathering current partners into old pricingĢ) Giving more notice, i got none except mid-last year there were rumors, bringing it up to my account manager yielded, "it's something we're considering, nothing is concrete."ģ) Giving further discounts to current partners.Ĥ) Making the change only apply to future storage. I get it, they think people are abusing the platform by buying the minimum cloud storage and using all local. I know, you can pay per agent to get around this but it's a big price increase either way. Too bad they just screwed over their existing partners by starting to charge by the gig of storage in their cloud (100$/TB/Month) as well as on your own local storage devices (35$/TB/Month) Yeah, you pay per the gig to store on your own hard drives. Long time Acronis user and former fan here.
0 kommentar(er)
